The Good Literary Citizen

I’m having an unusually quiet (writing) week, listening to the noise of a hammer and a radio playing on the lawn as workers repair my porch. I could write during the racket, interspersed with the sounds of traffic and occasional voices passing on the sidewalk. But instead I’m marveling at how clear my to-do list is. This summer, instead of planning to get the Crime Spell Books anthology out the door to KDP in September, it’s almost ready to go—in August. I have time to work on a short story and the sixth Anita Ray mystery. How did this happen, I ask?

Over the last several years, I’ve trimmed my volunteer activities, cutting back on responding to last-minute requests for help, or invitations to join another committee. But as I see blocks of time open up and think of things I’ve put off and can now get to, I’m reminded of something else. I didn’t get here on my own. I had help. 

The one key reason I continue to volunteer for various groups devoted to writers and writing, artists and their mediums, is I believe in the importance of sharing what I know with others. When I started out writing, back in the 1980s and even earlier, in college, friends read my work and offered suggestions. That meant they took time for me. I joined a writer’s group, the first of several, and listened carefully to how they commented on each other’s work in a way that was clear and respectful, and vowed to always do the same. I went to classes, asked questions, offered to help organize workshops, and read other writers’ work. As my skills improved, and I began to publish short fiction and then novels, I was invited to participate on conference panels. I read and commented on work by writers I didn’t know, wrote reviews, composed blurbs. I enjoyed it all.

The kind of volunteer work I do with and for other writers has changed over the years. My initial modest reader responses to someone’s new story has now been replaced with a critique of how a panel will work with these writers or those, who brings what to the table and how will the writers complement each other. I refer new writers to agents I think will like their work, I advise writers interested in self-publishing what that will mean (or not mean).

I think it matters that writers share what they have learned on their own or from others, participate in the larger community, and help bring along new writers. We benefit from working with each other. Even during my college years, when I worked on the student humor magazine, I understood that to succeed, we had to work with each other. That has never not been true in all the years since. I’ve enjoyed watching new writers find their voice, an agent, a publisher; established writers try something new; others take a risk and stretch themselves. That “top of the heap” some strive for is not a peak; it’s a mesa. There’s a lot of room at the top, or whatever we call it. Sharing it with others is more fun than standing there alone.

The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Who Am I kidding? by Heather Haven

As of late, I have been MIA from the writing scene. Actually, I’ve been missing from most of life. I’ve been through something that came out of the blue and lasted for 3 months. But I have no intention of writing about it. It involves pneumonia, a blood infection, and a nasty bacterium that landed on the aortic valve of my heart, damaging the valve. All of that led to open-heart surgery. Hmmm. Well, I guess I’ve just written about it.

But that’s about all you’ll read from me. No day-to-day happenings, no long-winded tales about the experience, other than one word: scary, intense, and mind-blowing.. But I have to acknowledge how miraculous it is that open-heart surgery exists, and it can save your life. Hmmm. Well, I guess I’ve just blown the one-word thing, too.

You see, I don’t do non-fiction. Not even my own. I’m not comfortable with it. Fiction is my game, and writing about real life, other than pulling out what I need for my made-up mysteries, is not for me. True crime novels and movies scare me. I really don’t want to think about real things that happen. Nope, give me fiction every time. And if you can make it light-hearted or funny, so much the better.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I follow the news every day, online, in newspapers, “ABC World News with David Muir,” and CNN. Then I gnash my teeth, pull out my hair, and wonder what the world is coming to. When I’ve had enough of that and my blood pressure is at an all-time high, I switch the station to “The Big Bang Theory,” “Mike & Molly,” or “Matlock,” depending on my mood. Here, I know justice will be served and, if I’m lucky, I will have a few laughs.

Every word of my work-in-progress, Cleopatra Slept Here, book 11 of the Alvarez Family Murder Mysteries, is made up. At the moment, it lies fallow, being a scriptus interruptus. But I plan to get back to this pack of lies as soon as possible. My bogus characters and storyline patiently await me. They will do nothing without me because, thankfully, they aren’t real. They exist only in my head. And that’s the truth.

The Joy of Writing a Series

The third book in my Hood River Valley Mystery/Thriller Series is coming out soon. Her Last Breath is about a serial killer who has targeted my detective’s ex-husband, the sheriff. Here is the blurb:

Game on, Sheriff!

Detective Liz Ellisen is ready to walk away. After closing the most grueling case of her career, her resignation letter to Sheriff Mitchell Ellisen—her husband of twenty-five years and soon-to-be-ex—sits unfinished on her desk.

Then the call comes.

A young woman’s body is discovered in an abandoned barn. Staged to look like suicide, but Liz knows better. This is murder—calculated, methodical, and just the beginning.

In the barn’s dusty loft, an old Army trunk holds grim secrets; women’s pelvic bones, yellowed with age. As more young women vanish, taunting messages directed at the Sheriff begin to surface.

While racing to find the missing women, Liz battles demons on all sides—her failed marriage, her birth mother’s sudden reappearance, and the mounting evidence that points to an unthinkable suspect.

The clock is ticking, the body count rising and the killer’s game escalating.

Liz can only wonder why the Sheriff is being targeted by a killer…or is he the killer?

I’m excited to get the reaction to this book from my readers. Will they like the direction I’m taking the series? Will they continue to want more stories about these characters?

With this third book, I’m finding joy in writing a series character. I’ve found that with every book I learn more about my characters. I’ve become more engaged in their lives. I want to know what will happen next. And I hope my readers feel the same way.

My first published book was a standalone. Lots of people asked if I planned to write more books about the characters. Although I was happy that they wanted more, I felt it was one and done. I told the story, and it was finished. In my mind I didn’t need to write another book about these characters.

Then I decided to write a series. I’m finding that along with all of the fun things in doing a series, there are also issues. Keeping true to each character. Keeping them interesting and the story fresh. Remembering names and dates is a challenge and I’ve found myself messing up sometimes.

I took an online class from Deborah Crombie who writes the amazing Duncan Kincaid/Gemma James series. She said that one of the most important things you should do when writing a series is to keep a series bible. List everything about the characters that you can think of because you will need that information at some point.

I don’t know how many times I’ve had to go back to that bible and look for the name of a character who had a small part in the story. Or the name of a street where something happened. I tripped myself up by changing my detective’s parent’s names. Her father started out as Joel Scott, which I changed to George Scott, then discovered while writing the third book that I’d changed his name back to Joel! Needless to say, I had to do ‘search and find’ and change his name to George because that’s what I used in the published books. And I had changed her mother’s name from Melanie to Missy and had to change it back. It’s a very good thing that I caught both name changes and that I had written the correct names in my bible.

While the characters with small parts don’t seem that important, you never know when they will take on a larger role in a story somewhere down the road. So, it’s very important to get their names right. I’ve also had my first readers find eye color changes, and my characters being in a room and a scene or two later coming out of a different room. I’m so thankful for first readers!

I’ve been busy editing the new book, and now that it’s in the hands of my editors, I’m beginning a new standalone. I’m excited to write this book, which is something very different than what I’ve done so far. But I also find that I’m anxious to get back to my series and see what my characters are up to next. I touched on human trafficking in My Sister’s Keeper, the first book in this series, but book four will go deeper into the topic. I’m so excited to start writing it and I hope I do it justice.

First sentence, first page, a first for me


Summer is here—and it has brought with it sunshine, warmth, and my new mystery Melt. I thought I’d share the opening page with you. It’s a different kind of first page for me, but then Melt is a different kind of book for me.

It’s the second in the Lotus Detective Agency series, and my first sequel. The first book, Bind, introduced three women who meet in a yoga studio and join forces to discover who’s stolen a Patek Philippe watch from what was supposed to be a secure locker. It opens gently basking in the warmth and serenity of the Asana yoga studio. There is no basking in Melt.

The first line came quickly. I deleted it just as quickly. It came back and stubbornly refused to move from top spot. I asked others—writers, editors, friends, wonderful strangers who turned up at my readings—for their opinion. Most liked it. Some loved it. Some shuddered.

Now I get to ask you what you think about the first sentence, and the first page. As you’ll read, there’s a bit of theme in these first 500 words.

Luke’s balls are itchy.

His left hand, casually resting on his left thigh, is mere inches from his testicles. He could surreptitiously edge his hand forward and find relief.

“Surreptitiously” is not a word in Luke’s usual vocabulary. It has nothing to do with IQ. Indeed, Luke is smart enough to read the room before he moves his hand a nanometer. He scans the beige walls, the brown tables, the black gowns, the onyx gavel. A courtroom, he concludes, is not the best place to scratch your scrotum. Luke clenches his legs together to stop the itching. Now he has to piss.

Luke looks up to see the judge looking down at him. “I want to confirm your plea. You understand by pleading guilty to trafficking a schedule one drug you could spend 25 years in a federal prison.”

This is not news to Luke. It is not good news, certainly, but it is not a surprise. It is what he has signed on for. Luke’s lawyer nudges him. Luke stands up. He returns the judge’s gaze without malice or defiance. “Yes, your honor, I understand.”

The associate chief justice of the supreme court of Nova Scotia quickly and efficiently takes in Luke’s demeanor, his clarity of voice. She takes in his blue suit, at least one size too large; his tartan tie, with Value Village written all over it; his left hand, which seems to have a small twitch. She looks into Luke Castle’s eyes. She sees what she often sees: fear. What she does not see is hope.

Justice Louise Redmond shifts her gaze to the Crown prosecutor. Then to defense counsel. She reaches for the gavel. “I am not sentencing a seventeen-year-old boy to federal prison before I have a fitness assessment conducted.” The judicial mallet hits its thick round oak base. “Under section 672.11 of the Criminal Code of Canada, I hereby order a comprehensive competency assessment be conducted on Lucas Raymond Castle. Sentencing will follow pending the results of the assessment.”

There is a shuffle of chairs as the lawyers rise. They reach for their files and their briefcases. The court reporter removes the flash drive from the stenograph. The bailiff moves toward the rear door that leads into the judges’ private offices. Justice Louise Redmond is not finished, however. She stands. “I would like to see counsel in my chambers immediately.”  Looking into the public gallery, she locks eyes with an attractive man in a grey suit and black turtleneck that contrasts perfectly with his onyx skin. “Detective Terrell, please join us.”

Justice Redmond walks through the rear door without looking back. The two lawyers look at each other and shrug. They turn to look at Detective First Class Michael Terrell. He shrugs.

Luke Castle scratches his balls.

Guest Blogger ~ Lee Upton

The Romance of Reading

When I entered first grade I didn’t know the alphabet and was put in the group of children who were having the most difficulty learning to read. At some point I began to read without any  trouble. Then came third grade when all of us children were told if we finished ten books we could claim a prize. 

To claim the prize meant telling the teacher, which meant she would lead us to the box to select from among the many-colored jumble of prizes: tiny plastic dolls and pretty paper fans and box cars and gold-spined books. I coveted those treasures with all my heart.

And yet I would not claim the prize.

Instead, I re-read the tenth book for weeks, staring at the pages. The book was about a child who lived in a city, walked to school, and learned how to obey the stoplights to cross the street safely. I was a child who rode the bus to a rural Catholic school where someone got punished for putting a cigarette in the outstretched hand of the statue of Mary at the top of the stairs. As I reread and reread the tenth book the other children claimed their prizes.

My desire for a prize was desperate, but not so much that I would claim one. I was too shy. I had seen our teacher put one of the children on her lap. She must have been kind, must have delighted in giving prizes. But I couldn’t bear it, couldn’t bear the attention.

The book was my shield. More books would shield me later. In a few years it would be determined that I was myopic and couldn’t make out what was written on the blackboard. Before problems with my eyesight were detected, books continued to be my shield and my comfort—not because of shyness but because I could see most clearly what was written on a page only inches from my face.

In elementary school it wouldn’t be long before I discovered what I call the romance of reading. That is, I read a book that captured my whole attention in a way I had never yet experienced. The book told a story about Robin Hood. At the end, Robin Hood dies. I had no idea. I was so immersed in the book during a silent reading period at school that when an arrow pierced Robin Hood’s heart I cried out with shock. I was too astonished to be embarrassed by my outburst. What I felt for that book: it was like a first romance, and I refused to be embarrassed or ashamed by my response. Ever since, I’ve refused to be embarrassed by anyone’s judgment about what I’m reading. Reading is a romance—and no one else’s judgment should apply.

The word “romance” is hard to explain, at least in the way I want to consider the word.

Years ago a Frenchman, a stranger, asked me what the word “romance” meant. That seemed odd—wouldn’t a Frenchman know the answer, if anyone does? For some reason we were looking at a barrel inside of which a big silver fish was swimming. I tried to answer, but I don’t think he understood what I meant and, anyway, I was distracted by the fish.

If I had to answer now I might say that romance is a willing agreement to engage in a fever dream that can happen in various circumstances, even between one person and one book. That is, reading can be a romance—heady, passionate, and consuming, full of uncertainty and, sometimes, comedy. Even if a story is read aloud to us, each of us in our own minds gives the story life—and what we read may change our sense of time and readjust our sense of the space we occupy. Such reading may even allow a secret undomesticated part of ourselves to flourish. When we are engaged in the romance of reading we are not escaping the confines of our life, not exactly. It’s more like entering a country that never before existed, a country we are helping to bring into being through a quality of attention that creates an intimate experience. It doesn’t feel lonely, although most often conducted in solitude.

My new novel, Wrongful, is a literary mystery in which a popular novelist apparently disappears at a festival where various writers are behaving badly. My primary character, Geneva Finch, is what I think of as an ideal reader, a tenacious reader who has felt deeply what it means to carry on a romance with a series of books. She is an avid admirer of the novels of the popular novelist Mira Wallacz, and she is haunted by the mystifying circumstances surrounding Wallacz’s last moments. She can be critical of what she reads, and she recognizes that her attitudes and behaviors have been shaped by books—and that she may need to adjust her expectations accordingly. Yet reading, for her, sometimes comes close to voluntary enchantment.

I’ve written before about the romance of reading. In “The Ideal Reader,” the opening story of my collection The Tao of Humiliation, a biographer attempts to solve a mystery about a famous writer’s abandonment of his writing—and of his own daughter, who is explicitly identified in the story as an ideal reader. Another story, “Night Walkers,” in my collection Visitations, is about the world’s laziest book club, whose members tend to avoid reading any books and whose main character must regain and newly strengthen her ability to read fiction after enduring her husband’s betrayal. In “Gods and Goddesses in Art and Legend” (Visitations) a woman comes to a realization about how her reading has contoured her expectations far too much: “What new pattern was she going to make for her life? Whatever it was, her life couldn’t be made only of books. Not only of books. Although partly of books, that was true.”

Although an ideally generous reader, Geneva Finch in Wrongful is not a faultless reader—she can jump to conclusions too readily, and she can be willfully naive about authors, at least initially—yet she enters into what she reads with generosity. She doesn’t suspend her judgment, but neither does she suspend her capacity to be changed by her reading, to dwell in the country of the imagination and meet its requirements. She is, in a sense, the perfect reader for Mira Wallacz’s novels, for at their deepest levels both Geneva and the novels’ author endure the lingering effects of loss and self-blame. Their encounter in the novel may be brief. Nevertheless, an unconscious recognition pervades their meeting.

The traces of an underground or inexplicable mystery animates the romance of reading and propels us through certain books. We feel the pull of sensations we may not quite understand. Reading may be an encounter, sometimes with something that we are hazily trying to remember and pursue. I think this is true for us as authors as well: an author writes another book in search of the answer to an inexplicable mystery. 

The dedication page of Wrongful is inscribed “to the rightful reader”—those readers for whom the book is right at this time in their lives, who will be sure of their right to imagine, to read close to the page or in the mirror ball of what we know of culture and history, to read to the end of the book, or to stop short and put the book down, or even to read to the end and start all over again.

I don’t think there can be one sort of ideal reader. Each book we read is its author’s attempt to find the right reader. And as readers we make the ultimate choice—will this be a book we can drop, without hurting anyone’s feelings (the author will never know) or a whirlwind romance, or a cherished encounter that we hate to see end? Will we return to reread the book, faithful year after year? Meanwhile, for readers and writers alike, when a book clicks for us, the romance of reading is ardent and head-turning—a new springtime.

WRONGFUL

When the famous novelist Mira Wallacz goes missing at the festival devoted to celebrating her work, the attendees assume the worst—and some hope for the worst. Ten years after the festival, Geneva Finch, an ideal reader, sets out to discover the truth about what happened to Mira Wallacz. A twisty literary mystery dealing with duplicity, envy, betrayal, and love between an entertainment agent and a self-deprecating former priest, Wrongful explores the many ways we can get everything wrong, time and again, even after we’re certain we discovered the truth.

byuy link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1963846214

Lee Upton is the author of books of poetry, fiction, essays, and literary criticism. Her forthcoming literary mystery, WRONGFUL, in which writers behave badly at two literary festivals, is forthcoming in May 2025. Her comic novel, TABITHA, GET UP, appeared in May 2024. Her seventh collection of poetry, THE DAY EVERY DAY IS, received the 2021 Saturnalia Prize and appeared in spring 2023. Her second short story collection, Visitations, was a recipient of the Kirkus star and was listed in “Best of the Indies 2017” and “Best Indie Books for December” by Kirkus. The collection was also a finalist in the short story collections category of the American Book Fest Best Book Awards

Facebook: facebook.com/uptonlee

Instagram: leeupton45

Lee Upton’s website: https://www.leeupton.com/

Publisher’s site with reviews and purchasing sites: https://www.saggingmeniscus.com/catalog/wrongful/

Bluesky: @leeupton.bsky.social

On X: @LeeUpto10998691