A few years ago I heard a talk by John Cleese on creativity. Readers may remember him from Fawlty Towers and Monty Python, and the antic skits of the characters.
Cleese didn’t talk about the expected issues of creating characters or structuring story lines. His focus was on creativity broadly defined, and how each one of us can learn to be creative. One comment in particular stayed with me because it seemed simple but also hard. It wasn’t particularly profound but it was the kind of insight that came as the result of experience. He said one of his co-workers jumped on the first idea that came, he was sure it would work, and he insisted on going forward with that. I certainly understand the feeling of facing a problem in a story and having a solution fall into my brain that seems absolutely perfect because I want it to be perfect. Not knowing what to write next is extremely uncomfortable. Maybe other writers don’t feel that way, but I certainly do. My instinct is to grab the solution and run, grateful for having an answer to my problem pop up.
Cleese’s warning was this. The first idea to come isn’t the best. His co-worker, Cleese felt, invariably produced something far less successful or not at all successful than what he would have developed if he’d waited. Cleese’s point, put less elegantly, is to consider the first idea the clutter that is concealing the better ideas, which require more time to surface. As frustrating as this can be, he’s right.
Living with uncertainty is hard especially when you want to maintain the forward motion of the narrative. You’ve set up your characters to act and now you’ve got them marking time, marching back and forth across the page, and you’re worried they’ll lose their mojo.
My current WIP seemed finished—polished and well put together, the story arc complete. I had a quiet doubt that maybe one or two aspects weren’t quite right, but I was ready to attribute those to the usual insecurities of the writer. I was wrong to do so. I just got the ms back with comments that hit those passages, and they need work. (Thank Heavens for the honest reader.)
This feedback reminded me of an earlier experience when an academic colleague gave me a draft of an article to read and comment on. I pointed out the various spots where he hadn’t answered related questions. He insisted they didn’t matter, but I felt they did. “You have all these puzzle pieces that are part of the question, but you only resolve half of them. You have to resolve all of them,” I told him, “to justify your conclusion.”
In my mystery novel I’m dealing with creating steps in the logic based on facts I created. To solve the problems of the plot, I have to sit with it for several days, listening to the characters, and letting the desire to get things on paper fall away while I wait for my unconscious to work. I have to be patient and trust my own creative resources. I have no idea how long this will take, but it’s necessary. And once the hidden ideas come to light, things will start to make sense, and I can move forward.
If you want to learn more about John Cleese’s approach to creativity, you can explore his book Creativity: A Short and Cheerful Guide by John Cleese, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/50719532-creativity
7 thoughts on “John Cleese on Creativity”
Good post! I like to do what I call “stewing and brewing.” It’s when I come up with an idea or premise for a book long before I write it. I slosh ideas and “what ifs” around in my brain and jot things down on a notepad until I finally settle on the “truth” to the story and where I want the story to begin. I think it’s kind of like what you are talking about. Not always using the first idea (bud) that comes but allowing it to grow and blossom into a bigger, better idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paty, that’s a good description of the internal process. That early period is the time to let the story grow and change and find its shape. I love that “stewing and brewing.”
What a wonderful article! I have long loved John Cleese, not just for his acting and comic ability, but as a writer and creator. How true it is that often the first solution is not the best one. That’s why we have erasers on the end of our pencils.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You made me laugh. My mechanical pencil has a very short eraser, and it’s not easy to get to. So now I have special erasers from Japan–wonderful little things (not so little).
I don’t know why I couldn’t get rid of the second photo, but there it is. Something else to ponder today.
Thanks for sharing–many good ideas to consider.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Comments are closed.