The Mystery of Romance – or is it the Romance of Mystery?

by Janis Patterson

Last weekend I was fortunate enough to be included on the panel at the public library sponsored Romance in Bonham, a nice county seat town a little over an hour away. The ladies of the library hold this event every other February, and it’s great fun. After the panel discussion and the book signing and everything is all over they provide the panelists and the family members they bring along a down-home potluck lunch. Always some of the best ‘lady food’ I’ve ever had! (Wish they’d do a cookbook…)

Although this is a romance-centric event, I brought several of my mysteries and was slightly astonished at the interest they generated. Apparently there is a growing interest for more mystery in romances – or more romance in mysteries. Both of which, I think, are a very good thing. For far too long readers and writers both have been pigeonholed into fairly rigid and unforgiving categories. Mystery was mystery. Romance was romance. Romantic suspense was a step in the right direction, but unfortunately it was soon codified into so much a percentage romance, so much a percentage mystery/adventure by most traditional publishers.

Now, almost in the manner of a superhero, self-publishing has started to break down the artificial barriers between genres, allowing them to become just stories with all kinds of elements. Want a mystery with lots of blood and danger and nary a kiss between characters? It’s out there. Want an exciting mystery where a couple falls in love while evading the bad guys/saving the world/whatever? It’s out there. Want a tender romance where a couple falls in love happily ever after while solving a usually gentle mystery? It’s out there. Want any combination of the above? Or just about anything else, including vampires, shapeshifters talking cats or kung-fu knitters? Even all at once? It’s out there.

I don’t know if the traditional publishers – the kind one finds on the shelves of your local bookstore, if there are many of those left – have twigged to how complete this revolution of thought is, but the virtual aisles of electronic/print on demand publishing are full of proof. You can find almost any permutation of any storyline now. Self and small publishing have opened up the world of stories, and readers/writers are no longer bound to restrict their desires to the small and rigid genres the trad publishers have decreed will make them the most money. True, in the days when traditional publishing reigned supreme and controlled not only content but distribution, print runs were enormous and had to be done ahead of release, then stored in gigantic warehouses. The publishers had to look to what would give the best return on their not-inconsiderable investment. Now, though, in the burgeoning world of electronic and print on demand self-publishing, such considerations are no longer the end-all and be-all of what’s available. Niche markets that were too small to interest the trad publishers are now flourishing and expanding.

And that’s all to the good. Choice is a good thing, and genre-blending is a good way to expand reader interest. If there is a downside, it’s that the freedom of self-publishing has opened the floodgates to an unbelievable amount of pure dreck. There are people who believe that not only putting down X number of words is writing a book, but that doing so will guarantee them fame and fortune. We can only hope that their number dies off quickly, because this wave of badly written, badly conceived and badly formatted messes is reflecting badly on self-published books as a whole. There are self-pubbed books (usually written by veterans – or perhaps we should say survivors – of the trad publishing industry) whose quality is unquestionably equal to or better than anything from the Big 5, but they are shadowed with the prevailing belief that all self-published books are rubbish. That’s a misconception that only time and persistence can alter. But it will, it surely will, and writers and readers the world over will benefit from it.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Janis Patterson and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Mystery of Romance – or is it the Romance of Mystery?

  1. skyecaitlin says:

    Janis: I happen to enjoy a blending of genres. although I am less inclined to read romance, the notion of mystery/romance appeals to me; many of my favorite crime writers combine both, and that seems to advance my interest.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I write romantic mysteries, meaning the mystery fiction has an element of romantic love in it. I prefer to read mysteries that have well-developed characters that are much like real people and don’t just woodenly go about solving crimes. The blending of genres seems to be in the cards for the future of fiction.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. patyjag says:

    Janis, Great post! I agree, with self-publishing the reader is getting more than they did before and it’s good not only for them but the creative writer as well. Like Jacqueline, I agree that by adding romance to the mystery the characters feel more well-developed and human.

    Like

  4. ambfoxx says:

    I’m a genre-blender writer myself, so of course I loved this post. And I’ve been reading more and more indie books and enjoying their originality. My two most reliable ways to find good ones are: is the author a member of Sisters in Crime? SinC members have such a good network of advice, education and support, they produce books I can count on for quality. I’ve also found that B.R.A.G. Medallion winners don’t disappoint me. Dreck doesn’t earn that award. I review indie books on one of my other blogs, if anyone is interested, and recently reviewed a great mystery (with romance in it) by one of our fellow Ladies of Mystery, Jane Gorman. https://everywhereindies.wordpress.com/2016/02/09/review-a-blind-eye-by-jane-gorman/

    Liked by 1 person

    • skyecaitlin says:

      Amber, I just tried to subscribe to Jane-Gorman’s newsletter: but the subscription did not work and my attempt to contact her would not submit. I grew up in Philadelphia and then moved to Cherry Hill, quite honestly, she is up the road from me. Jane, if you read this, I live in Marlton.

      Like

  5. EARL STAGGS says:

    Susan, once again, you have hit the head of the nail. As you said, self-pubbing has changed the playing field, but it will take a while for it to sort out. I hope we live that long.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. dearaggie says:

    I write the Aggie Mundeen Mystery Series where Aggie frustrates the detective she secretly loves by “helping” with his investigations. The series is cozy/traditional, and the conflict between Aggie and Detective Sam, romantic and otherwise, adds tension to solving the mystery. Humor adds another element. Why would we not add all appropriate elements to enrich the story?
    Nancy G. West

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s