Short Stories v. Mysteries

copyThe Short Mystery Fiction Society (SMFS) has been hosting an on-line discussion about whether a writer should begin by writing short stories before tackling novels. Several of the contributors think that writing short stories is a good way to hone writing skills before tackling the longer work. Others say short stories often provide material which later turn into novels while there are some who feel that they are separate skills to master. I like to write short stories between novels, giving myself a break, developing other characters and situations, but I wouldn’t say I was an accomplished short story writer.

Short stories aren’t easy to write. They require at least as much skill as writing novels, maybe more. The idea that you can learn how to write novels by writing short stories doesn’t seem accurate to me. Generally, the best short story writers write only those.
I have a tendency to add too much extraneous material in a short story, turning it into not quite a novella but something which is too long for a story and too short for anything else. The short story writer needs to stick to the point of the story, forget the extra material that crops up, and, particularly with mystery short stories, work toward an ending that will at least slightly surprise the reader. O’Henry, of course, was the master of the plot twist, as was Saki, but those are classics, and few of us write classics. But readers feel cheated if the story ends with a whimper, not at least a small bang.

Literary short stories are different in that they don’t need a surprise ending, but they do need an epiphany of some sort on the part of the protagonist, some change in him or her. Alice Munro, a favorite of mine, writes only short stories, and she is a master. Most of her stories take place in rural Canada, and I identify with her characters and the setting because of years I spent as a child in rural upstate New York. Her stories are long for short stories, encompassing a lot of their characters’ experiences, often their whole lives. But the main character always experiences some change, some new realization in the way she sees the world. Such writing is not easy to do. I think writing short stories requires an equal or greater amount of skill than writing novels. You can hone your writing skills on them, but in order to write them well, you need to master that art.

Still, writing a short story from beginning to end can be very rewarding. There’s no need to go back to it day after day, week after week, month after month, as with a novel. Short stories may have a dreaded middle, but it’s a short middle, unlike the middle of the novel.
The dreaded middle of the novel occurs when the writer, full of enthusiasm, has set up the premise, developed the characters and setting, told the reader what the conflict is, and has the reader in suspense about how the conflict will be solved; but there are at least a hundred pages before the beginning of the ending. We’ve all read those: the novels that start out terrifically with great characters and an interesting plot and setting that then go limp in the middle. We wonder why we started reading the novel in the first place, wonder if we should just quit, but we can’t just jump ahead because something may happen that makes the end understandable. The shortness of the story makes that middle not nearly so dangerous. Just make it a shorter story!

I’ve had people say to me, “I don’t like short stories because it takes time to figure out who’s doing what and why and then the story’s over, and I have to start all over again.” Those readers like novels, where they can immerse themselves in a world: they meet the characters, know the setting and learn the problems and the difficulty of finding the solution. Then they can luxuriate in that world for days or even weeks. Others like short stories because they can move quickly into a new setting with new characters, determine the problem and reach the climax, all in a short time. Each story is an exploration of a new experience.

What do you, my readers, think? Do you read short stories? Do you like them or do you prefer novels, and why? Let’s talk.

Advertisements

About casojka123

I grew up in New York and moved to California when I was in my twenties. I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Africa and when I returned I got a master's degree from the University of Southern California. I worked as the administrator in a public law office, and now I write mystery novels of the "whodunit", multiple suspect, police procedural variety. I live in a small town in Southern California with my husband and two dogs.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Short Stories v. Mysteries

  1. janegorman says:

    Hi Carole. I agree with you. Short story writing and novel writing are very different skills. I’m not sure that one prepares you for the other (whichever direction you move). Of course, the more you write, the better you get, so writing a short story can certainly help improve your writing skills. Personally, I’ve never gotten into reading short stories. I’m one of those readers who look forward to digging in to a meaty story. So I write what I read!

    Like

    • casojka123 says:

      I’m more inclined to read novels than short stories, too. I like the feeling of being in a whole world, while short stories are only a glimpse of the edge of that world.

      Like

  2. Amber Foxx says:

    I enjoy both. I can especially get into reading a short story collection by a single author. (I loved Murakami’s collection After the Quake.) As for writing short stories, I find they help me with writing longer fiction, as I practice the art of paring down excess words and reaching the essence of the story. And from a practical standpoint, short fiction has helped me reach an audience for my longer fiction.

    Like

  3. I’ve never successfully written a short story, though I’ve written novels and feel confident with that process. I rarely read short stories. I remember meeting Katherine Hall Page at a book signing in New England. In addition to her new release, she had with her a few other titles, including a volume of short stories. She held up the stories enthusiastically and, probably in response to my unenthusiastic expression, shrugged and said something like, “Not everyone likes short stories. They’re different.” I bought the book of stories and never read one. (That says a lot about me, not about Katherine Hall Page, whom I admire! I’ve read every Faith Fairchild and have the latest on my TBR pile.) Carole’s response to Jane resonates with me! I like to immerse myself in a world when I pick up a book and enjoy several interwoven stories that play off each other within the same work. –kate

    Like

  4. patyjag says:

    Even though I’ve always been a minimalist writer, I still struggle with writing short stories. I’ll read either short stories or novels if they grab my attention. Great post, Carole!

    Like

  5. In the “old days,” authors began their careers with short stories in magazines and used that work to land an agent and book contract. Now with self pub and small presses, many writers skip short stories altogether and jump straight into novels. I did. Both art forms have their pluses and fans. Good post!

    Like

  6. marilynm says:

    I read both, but have only written a couple of short stories for anthologies–but my novels tend to be shorter than most.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s